Featured Reviews

At Corporate Crypto Banks Ranking, we strive to find the best places to store, trade and mine cryptocurrency. Our featured lists can help you easily navigate the crypto world.

News

Corporate Crypto Banks Ranking is the perfect place to learn about cryptocurrencies and start to understand some of the fundamental concepts behind the blockchain.

The post Chainlink Price Prediction: Can LINK Rebound as Whales Withdraw $612K From Binance? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Chainlink (LINK) is approaching a critical support area after retreating from its October highs, putting its recent recovery at risk. The token is trading near $10.86, with its daily chart showing repeated attempts to hold the $10.70–$11.00 region. Meanwhile, large-wallet activity is drawing attention after a whale withdrew approximately 57,000 LINK worth $612,550 from Binance …

Circle said on Nov. 5 that it froze approximately $1.1 billion in USDC linked to the Oct. 29 theft of roughly $6.3 billion from Binance . Elliptic says more than $3 billion in stolen assets can now be stopped only when they reach an exchange or another service, including about 233 million XRP in one address. Circle can block transfers of USDC from affected addresses . Stopping other assets requires action by a service that receives them. Circle’s freeze stops USDC at the address level Circle’s blocklist prevents affected addresses from sending or receiving USDC. It cannot reverse completed blockchain transfers or control the other assets taken from Binance. Circle said valid legal processes authorized its action, and that the freeze does not decide ownership or forfeit the assets. TRM Labs identified 823 million USDC in its account of Circle’s freeze. Its tracing describes how the attacker gained access to those funds: The wallet also served as the executor of a separate Binance smart account, which gave the attacker the ability to pull 823 million USDC from it. Circle froze that USDC shortly afterward. TRM Labs TRM’s 823 million USDC figure refers to the amount pulled from the smart account. Circle’s approximately $1.1 billion is its freeze total as of Nov. 5. The figures do not establish how much the amounts overlap, so they should not be added together. TRM counted about $2.7 billion frozen onchain as of 00:30 UTC on Oct. 30, after stablecoin issuers began blocking stolen funds. That figure covers an earlier point in the response and includes action across issuers. It is a different measure from Circle’s Nov. 5 total. More than $3 billion now depends on an off-ramp Elliptic says about 233 million XRP remains in one address. Circle’s blocklist acts on USDC, so it cannot stop that XRP from moving. Elliptic’s account of its tracing work places the XRP inside a larger pool of stolen assets. It identifies a receiving service as the next place those assets can be stopped: More than $3 billion of the stolen assets, including 233 million XRP sitting in a single address, can now only be stopped when they reach an exchange or other service. Elliptic For those assets, the next control point is the service where the attacker sends them. The service can screen an incoming transfer against addresses linked to the theft and act on a match before the funds are cashed out. Elliptic says its alerts have already led to freezes of some stolen Binance funds. Screening determines who can cash out Elliptic has published a free CSV blocklist containing more than 8,000 addresses linked to the theft. A crypto business can download the file and compare its entries with addresses involved in incoming transfers. Elliptic says its investigators update address data as the assets move through bridges, swaps and mixers. At the issuer: Circle can stop blocked addresses from moving USDC. Onchain: Tracing can follow stolen assets as they move to new addresses. At a service: An exchange or other recipient can act on a match before funds are cashed out. Each control applies at a different point. Circle’s block takes effect at the token level for affected USDC addresses, while tracing identifies where stolen funds go next. Screening gives a receiving service the address information it needs to decide whether to stop a deposit. That sequence matters when the attacker moves assets through a swap or bridge. Elliptic says it updates its data as those transfers occur, and businesses using its screening tools receive alerts when funds linked to the theft arrive. A service that acts on a match can block a cash-out route beyond Circle’s reach. The 233 million XRP balance remains in one address. The next marker is a transfer from that address to an exchange. The post Circle Froze Binance USDC, But Can’t Halt The Whole Heist appeared first on CryptoCoin.News .

The post World Liberty Financial (WLFI) Price Prediction 2026, 2027 – 2030: Is WLFI Entering Discovery Phase? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Story Highlights WLFI price today is at $ Price predictions for 2026 range from $0.30 to $0.80. Long term outlook suggests gradual growth potential to approach $5.00 by 2030. World Liberty Financial (WLFI), one of the emerging speculative plays in the altcoin market, remains under significant selling pressure after an extended decline. The token has …

The post How Low Could Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP Go If Crypto Keeps Dumping? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Since the start of this month, the global crypto market has lost more than $180 billion, bringing its total value down to $2.64 trillion. The drop comes after Democrats won the midterm elections, raising fears of stricter crypto rules. Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP are also showing signs of further losses as the market continues to …

Uniswap has a long-term bullish price structure, but in the coming days and weeks, it might be forced to retreat below $6.

FinCEN ordered US financial institutions to cease processing transfers to or from MEXC Global on November 6. According to the agency, the offshore crypto exchange conducted up to $16.7 billion in potentially illicit transactions. The actions taken by regulators reveal a fundamental flaw in the system used by offshore crypto exchanges. Even though the smart contracts are active, authorities are able to limit access to the exchanges as well as banks that allow exchanging cryptocurrency into money people can actually use. An order aimed at US middlemen, not a global shutdown The FinCEN exercised its authority per Section 9714(a) of the Combating Russian Money Laundering Act. The agency designated MEXC as a significant money laundering entity involved in the facilitation of Russian illegal finance. The new order prohibits US financial institutions from transferring fiat or cryptocurrency to or from MEXC. The prohibition takes effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The exchange will be able to continue its operations in other countries, but access to American financial systems will be unavailable to the exchange. The announcement about the new measure was made under Operation Economic Outcast . What FinCEN says MEXC moved According to FinCEN, between May 2021 and May 2026, MEXC Global had processed approximately $16.7 billion in transfers that appeared to be associated with illicit activity. Approximately $1.5 billion of this amount was found to involve Russian sanctions evasion, including $232 million in transactions directly between MEXC and entities under sanctions. FinCEN also identified various transactions involving Iranian and North Korean facilitators, including over $26 million linked to A7 and around $200 million involving A7A5. It should be noted that these transactions are related to those processed by MEXC exclusively, and are not necessarily money that originated from it. FinCEN’s findings do not, by themselves, prove that MEXC committed a crime. How A7 wired banks to crypto rails The order from FinCEN connects MEXC to A7, a state-backed Russian payment intermediary and fintech network. According to the agency, MEXC has facilitated transactions that were in favor of A7 and dealt with transfers relating to A7A5, the network’s ruble-pegged stablecoin. A7, which is supported by the Russian defense banking institution Promsvyazbank and Ilan Shor, has made use of banking and cryptocurrency in order to transfer money across borders. In the past, Cryptopolitan has reported how A7 managed to cover the bank transfers with fake trade documents as well as use crypto to perform other transactions. Moreover, TRM Labs has discovered over $166 billion in blockchain activity connected to A7. This amount includes different connections to North Korean and Iranian actors. accounting for all the activity of the A7 network and not just transactions related to MEXC. It should be noted that the $166 billion covers A7’s overall network activity rather than just through MEXC alone. On October 1, Treasury identified A7’s network as a: “significant transnational criminal organization.” Why the conversion gateways matter A7A5 shows how that pressure plays out. Elliptic tracked more than $102 billion in transfers before its average daily volume fell 96% from a July 2025 peak, reaching $24.3 million in June 2026. The token’s smart contracts kept working. What became harder was swapping A7A5 into liquid assets such as USDT. US authorities seized Garantex’s USDT in March 2025. Grinex lost bank-card deposit access in April 2026 and later reported a breach. The problem was access to liquidity, not failing code. FinCEN MEXC Banking Ban: $16.7B in Illicit Flows and A7A5’s 96% Collapse Possible liquidity and compliance ripples MEXC’s size makes the fallout worth watching. TokenInsight ranked it fourth in derivatives trading in Q3, with a 9.67% share. Chainalysis estimates sanctioned entities received $104 billion in 2025, up 694%. Banks and trading partners may tighten checks or move business elsewhere. Still, it is too early to claim a global liquidity shock. MEXC says user assets are secure and services are “operating normally.” The exchange also announced an independent compliance review in its November 6 statement . A7 denied helping Iran or terrorist groups, describing the allegation in its response as a: “blatant lie and slander.” Unlike the issued MEXC order, FinCEN’s separate A7 sub-agent restrictions are still proposed. MEXC’s wider market impact remains to be seen. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .