Featured Reviews
News
Rising institutional and retail selling, short-term holder sensitivity, and cascading liquidations have pushed Bitcoin below $73k.
Bitcoin investors may have witnessed the cryptocurrency’s final record-breaking rally, at least according to veteran trader Peter Brandt. The legendary chartist has sounded the alarm over a potentially massive bearish pattern emerging on Bitcoin’s weekly chart, warning that if the formation holds, the apex crypto’s October 2025 all-time high above $126,000 may never be surpassed in his lifetime. His alarming assessment comes as BTC reels from a brutal market downturn, adding fresh uncertainty to an already battered crypto market. Peter Brandt Flags Potential H&S Pattern That Could Spell Trouble for BTC Peter Brandt has raised the possibility that Bitcoin may have already reached its ultimate price peak after spotting a potentially significant bearish formation on its weekly chart. In a November 15 post on X , the renowned chartist questioned whether BTC was developing a legitimate head-and-shoulders (H&S) top, a technical pattern often associated with a major trend reversal. Brandt suggested that if the formation proves valid, he could construct a technical case that Bitcoin’s previous record high was its last, potentially remaining unbeaten for the rest of his lifetime. His warning is particularly striking given that Bitcoin reached a record of $126,080 in October 2025 before suffering a sharp correction. The H&S formation typically features three peaks, with the middle one (the head) rising above the two surrounding peaks (the shoulders). The pattern is considered bearish when the price breaks below the neckline, which connects the two troughs separating these peaks. Such a breakdown could signal weakening buying pressure and open the door to further losses. In Bitcoin’s case, the asset is approaching a crucial support zone between $60,000 and $65,000, which could serve as the neckline of the potential bearish formation. However, Brandt has not confirmed that Bitcoin has completed this formation. His assessment remains conditional on whether the chart structure represents a legitimate bearish reversal, meaning traders will likely watch the potential neckline for signs of confirmation. Bitcoin Faces Fourth Capitulation Wave Bitcoin has extended its recent decline, with selling pressure intensifying on Nov. 13 as the flagship cryptocurrency dropped below the psychologically significant $70,000 threshold for the first time since August. The latest downturn has deepened its weekly losses to approximately 14.8%, highlighting the growing bearish sentiment weighing on the broader crypto market. Meanwhile, crypto analyst James Check has pointed to another worrying development, suggesting Bitcoin is experiencing its fourth capitulation event since reaching its all-time high. According to Check, daily realized losses have surged, doubling from about $420 million to more than $850 million in just 24 hours. Check also offered a more optimistic perspective, arguing that Bitcoin has entered what he describes as a “deep value” zone. He noted that the cryptocurrency last traded in similar territory in February and late June this year, with the previous comparable occurrence dating back to the 2022 crypto bear market. However, the pundit cautioned that entering this zone does not necessarily mean Bitcoin has reached its market bottom. Instead, he suggested that investors who begin gradually accumulating BTC at these levels could eventually benefit if historical patterns repeat, potentially turning the current market weakness into a long-term buying opportunity.
Scam attempts aimed at XRP holders have reached intense levels, according to recent alerts from a well-known figure in the XRP Ledger community. Vet, a pseudonymous X account who also works as a dUNL validator while contributing to the XRP Ledger Foundation has used his platform several times to highlight the growing threat. In a recent check using platform data tools, he found that around 11.5 million posts directed at the XRP community appeared within a single 30-day stretch. The vast majority dangled fake airdrops or reward schemes designed to trick people into handing over funds or linking their wallets. He described the sheer number as eye-opening and pushed users to stay highly alert. Vet has also pointed out how quickly fraudsters react to genuine positive news. When real companies announce partnerships or integrations involving the XRP Ledger, scammers often rush to set up lookalike addresses and launch tokens that borrow those brand names. His advice is straightforward: treat every unexpected offer with suspicion, and trust only details that come directly from the company’s official channels. In many cases, the real institutions never publish public issuer addresses. He has spoken about the constant stream of scam tags that can make notifications almost impossible to manage. Seeing community members engage with these posts frustrates him, and he keeps returning to the same clear message. No one is giving away free XRP. The safest move is usually to ignore the approach completely. Even specific token launches have drawn his scrutiny. After a large Japanese firm introduced a yen-backed stablecoin, Vet warned that any version appearing on the XRP Ledger under a similar ticker was almost certainly fake without an official issuer confirmation. His ongoing posts underline a simple reality. Rising interest in XRP attracts more bad actors who try to cash in on the attention. For everyday holders, staying skeptical and double-checking everything remains the best protection.
Trump is now a lame duck whose crypto empire the Congress is eager to investigate.
A federal judge said perpetual contracts tied to individual US stocks appear to be security-based swaps and left their trading approvals in place. The contracts track a stock’s price without giving traders shares or setting an expiration date. The absence of an expiration date could determine whether US exchanges can offer them to retail traders. On Nov. 9, Coinbase, Kalshi and four other companies asked the court to accept a brief defending the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s classification of the contracts as security futures. That classification places them under rules shared with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Capital Markets Alliance Association, a trade group whose members include Cboe and Citadel Securities, argues that the contracts fall under the SEC’s tighter rules for security-based swaps. The six companies say the SEC has no exchange-traded retail framework for those swaps, which would shut off retail access. Coinbase Derivatives, KalshiEX and Bitnomial Exchange applied on Sept. 18 to list perpetual contracts tied to individual large US stocks. The CFTC’s product review process deemed their applications approved on Nov. 2. The trade group sued that day to overturn the approvals. In its complaint , the group argues that a contract without an expiration date cannot qualify as a security future. Judge Valerie Caproni’s early order found the group likely to succeed in arguing that the CFTC exceeded its authority. She denied a temporary restraining order because the group had not shown imminent, irreparable harm. Her assessment was preliminary, and the court has not ruled on the group’s separate request for a preliminary injunction. Coinbase and Kalshi joined Kraken parent Payward, DRW Holdings, Jump Trading and Paradigm Operations in the proposed brief . The companies argue that federal law does not require a fixed expiration date for a security future. They cite standardized terms, margin requirements and centralized clearing as features familiar from traditional futures. Funding payments help keep a perpetual contract’s price tied to the stock it tracks. Coinbase, Kalshi and Bitnomial face a decision on whether their approvals remain usable while the case proceeds. The trade group was scheduled to reply to the CFTC’s opposition to a preliminary injunction on Nov. 10. The post The Judge Sees Stock Perps As Swaps. Coinbase Says They’re Futures appeared first on CryptoCoin.News .
The question is no longer whether the leverage is gone. It's whether demand will ever come back.