Cardano (ADA) traded in a narrow range on Sunday amid a sharp rise in futures activity.

Bitcoin risks a slide to $57K as unliquidated longs stack below price and demand stays weak.

There's a special kind of cruelty in a scam that borrows the name of Wasabi Wallet, a tool built entirely around protecting your privacy and your funds. This week, that's exactly what happened. A fake version of Wasabi Wallet made it onto the Apple App Store, and at least one victim on X says it cost them 6 BTC, worth well over half a million dollars at current prices. What makes this genuinely alarming isn't just the loss itself, it's that Wasabi Wallet has never had a mobile app to begin with, and the company that built it has said so plainly. A Wallet That Was Never Supposed To Exist On Your Phone Wasabi Wallet, developed by zkSNACKs, is an open-source, non-custodial Bitcoin wallet built specifically around privacy features like Tor routing and CoinJoin transactions, and it has always been a desktop-only application for Windows, macOS, and Linux. That's not a minor technical footnote, it's a foundational fact any real user of the wallet would already know. You can confirm this directly through the project's official website here: https://wasabiwallet.io . Despite that, an app calling itself "Wasabi Bitcoin & Crypto Wallet" and falsely attributing itself to zkSNACKs appeared on the Apple App Store, complete with a description promising secure, easy-to-use wallet management. Multiple App Store reviewers flagged it directly, with one writing plainly that zkSNACKs is not the company behind the real Wasabi Wallet and urging others to check the official website before downloading. You can see the listing, and the warnings buried inside its own reviews, directly here: Wasabi Bitcoin & Crypto Wallet — Apple App Store . How A Six Bitcoin Loss Actually Happens I think it's worth walking through the mechanics here, because the appeal of these scams isn't sophistication, it's patience. Fake wallet apps typically work through two primary methods: Seed Phrase Harvesting: Prompting users to enter an existing seed phrase to "restore" a wallet. Infrastructure Control: Generating a brand new wallet on the attacker's own servers and presenting it as if it belongs to the user. Either path ends the same way: the moment a recovery phrase touches an internet-connected app controlled by someone else, every asset tied to that phrase becomes accessible to the attacker instantly, and irreversibly. For a victim losing 6 BTC, that's not a slow bleed, it's a single moment of misplaced trust turning into a total loss with no possibility of a chargeback , a dispute process, or a bank to call. That's precisely what makes wallet drainers so devastating compared to almost any other category of online fraud. This Is Part Of A Much Bigger Pattern Here's what I think deserves the most attention in this story: the fake Wasabi app isn't an isolated incident, it's reportedly the 27th wallet clone to reach the App Store this year alone. That's a staggering cadence for anyone who assumed Apple's review process functioned as a meaningful filter against this exact category of fraud. The largest confirmed case so far remains a fake Ledger app that made it through Apple's review process and drained victims of more than $9.3 million combined before it was caught. That case became the center of an ongoing lawsuit, with plaintiffs alleging Apple continued hosting fraudulent wallet apps even after receiving direct theft reports, in some cases allowing a second victim to lose funds to the same app days after the first report was filed. Kaspersky's own threat research team separately identified 26 fraudulent crypto wallet apps circulating on Apple's App Store earlier this year, using techniques like malicious library injection and fake App Store phishing pages to steal recovery phrases directly, a pattern strikingly consistent with what appears to have happened here. Why These Apps Keep Getting Through I don't think this is really a mystery so much as an uncomfortable structural reality. App store review processes were built primarily to catch malware behavior and policy violations, not to verify whether a financial app's stated developer actually owns the brand it claims to represent . A scammer doesn't need sophisticated code to pass review, they need a convincing icon, a plausible description, and enough patience to wait out the review queue. Once approved, these apps often sit quietly for weeks gathering downloads before the first victim reports match up to reveal the pattern, and by that point, the damage compounds with every additional install. That gap between "approved" and "removed" is where nearly every dollar in these cases gets lost. How To Actually Protect Yourself From Wallet Drainers Given how consistently this keeps happening, I think the defense here has to be treated as a personal habit rather than something you can outsource to app store trust: Start at the Source: Go directly to the project's official website first and follow the download link from there rather than searching the app store blind, since scammers frequently rank above real listings via paid ads or keyword manipulation. Respect Platform Limits: If a wallet's official site says there is no mobile app, as Wasabi's does, treat any mobile app claiming that brand as fraudulent by default, full stop. Guard Recovery Phrases: Never enter a seed phrase into any app you didn't personally verify through official channels, especially apps prompting you to "restore" or "import" immediately upon opening. Check Developer Names: Look closely at developer details, not just app icons or titles, as fraudulent listings frequently use generic or unrelated company names. Verify Before Re-Opening: If you've downloaded a wallet app you're now uncertain about, don't open it or enter anything into it, verify its legitimacy directly against the project's official website or social accounts first. The uncomfortable truth is that no amount of individual caution fully closes this gap while app stores keep approving impersonator apps in the first place. But until that changes, treating every mobile wallet app as guilty until independently verified against the official source is, unfortunately, the only reliable defense available right now. Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services. Follow us on X @nulltxnews

Nothing gets Russia buying cold storage devices faster than watching the government draw a hard line around how much crypto its citizens are legally allowed to touch. That's exactly what's playing out across the country right now. With just weeks left before one of the most consequential crypto regulations in the country's history takes effect, hardware wallet sales at major retailers have more than doubled and the reason has almost nothing to do with price speculation and everything to do with control . The Law That's Reshaping Russia's Crypto Market On August 4, 2026 , Russian President Vladimir Putin signed Federal Law No. 282-FZ , titled "On Digital Currencies and Digital Rights," establishing the country's first comprehensive legal framework for cryptocurrency trading, custody, and mining. The Bank of Russia confirmed the details through its official channel: non-qualified investors will be permitted to buy liquid cryptocurrencies for no more than 300,000 rubles a year through a single intermediary, and only after passing a suitability test. Most provisions take effect on September 1, 2026 , with a transition period running through July 1, 2027 to allow exchanges time to complete licensing. Central bank data places roughly 98% of Russian crypto investors in this restricted tier. This isn't a niche rule targeting whales, it's a strict ceiling applied to virtually the entire market. Why 300,000 Rubles Changes Everything for Retail Users Roughly $3,700 a year through a single licensed intermediary fundamentally restructures how a serious retail holder in Russia can legally grow their position. Crucially, that cap sits directly on the regulated on-ramp itself , not on the total amount of crypto someone can hold once it's already in their possession. The Regulatory Loophole: The law restricts how much crypto you can buy through the newly regulated system. It says nothing about restricting how you choose to store crypto you already own, or how tightly you control access to it once it's yours. The Domestic Payment Ban Nobody's Talking About Buried alongside the purchase cap is a second restriction that deserves equal attention: the law explicitly maintains Russia's existing ban on using cryptocurrency as payment for goods and services domestically. Crypto is being treated purely as an investment asset subject to strict oversight, not an everyday currency. When you pair a hard annual buying cap with a total domestic spending ban, the value proposition of leaving funds on a regulated intermediary narrows dramatically. If you can't spend it locally and can barely add to it officially, maintaining assets inside a monitored third-party platform offers almost no upside compared to independent, off-platform storage . Why Self-Custody Is Suddenly the Obvious Move A hardware wallet keeps private keys entirely offline, completely disconnected from any central exchange or custodial platform. Moving crypto to cold storage offers three distinct advantages under the new framework: No Ledger Tracking: Assets aren't tied to a licensed intermediary's ongoing purchase ledger or reporting requirements. Immunity to Account Actions: Cold storage eliminates the risk of sudden platform freezes, compliance locks, or account restrictions. Preserved Autonomy: For existing holders, moving assets into self-custody before September 1 represents the final window to secure full independent control before new registry rules take effect. What the Sales Numbers Actually Show The retail response has been immediate and measurable across major Russian sales channels: This isn't the first time Russia has seen a surge like this. Hardware wallet sales previously jumped five to eightfold in March and April 2022 , confirming a clear behavioral pattern: whenever financial or regulatory ground shifts sharply, Russian users default to self-custody. The Real Risk Hiding Behind the Rush This trend shouldn't be viewed without a clear-eyed warning. Self-custody shifts 100% of the responsibility for seed phrase protection, device backups, and firmware verification onto the individual user. There is no customer support desk to call if a key is lost or mishandled. Demand spikes of this magnitude invariably attract waves of counterfeit devices and phishing campaigns targeting inexperienced first-time buyers. For those rushing into self-custody ahead of the September deadline, the regulatory drive is completely understandable, but the learning curve for managing your own keys remains entirely unforgiving. Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services. Follow us on X @nulltxnews